Coordination paper with Rob

==references for the cognitive angle==
===from drew===
*Gigerenzer is a pole in the heuristics community, coming in heavy on the evolution side and walking the line well.  still an inclination in psych that evolutionary psych is not testable/not science.
*peter todd is interested in this stuff, the cognitive angle on macro questions
*prospect theory is offered as the psychologically plausible successor, via Kahneman and Tversky, to expected utility theory. (says [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prospect_theory wikipedia] 
*insofar as I am into games over time, I should talk to Busemeyer.  
*in my notes: "no microtheoretic interpretation of organizations"
===from Busemeyer, decision-making judgement angle===
*general answer was that this game is too complicated to be of interest to decision making community
*Busemeyer and Townsend 1993
*Townsend and Busemeyer 1989
*Duarte Araujo
*Rasmussen's game theory
*Busemeyer 2002 Motivational Underpinnings
*Emotional Cognition