<?xml version="1.0"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="http://enfascination.com/wiki/skins/common/feed.css?303"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
		<id>http://enfascination.com/wiki/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Intelligence_without_representation_Brooks_1987</id>
		<title>Intelligence without representation Brooks 1987 - Revision history</title>
		<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://enfascination.com/wiki/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Intelligence_without_representation_Brooks_1987"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://enfascination.com/wiki/index.php?title=Intelligence_without_representation_Brooks_1987&amp;action=history"/>
		<updated>2026-05-15T16:49:14Z</updated>
		<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.21.0rc5</generator>

	<entry>
		<id>http://enfascination.com/wiki/index.php?title=Intelligence_without_representation_Brooks_1987&amp;diff=2091&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Seth at 22:49, 27 March 2009</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://enfascination.com/wiki/index.php?title=Intelligence_without_representation_Brooks_1987&amp;diff=2091&amp;oldid=prev"/>
				<updated>2009-03-27T22:49:17Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;After reading intellignece without reason, I wasreally excited to read this one.  But they are very different.  This is much shorter and experiment based, so the scope is necessarily smaller.  The tone is very different, the most memorable part is that he ends by saying that talk is cheap, which demonstrates the excitement.  I wonder when we'll get the principles that will allow us to pick up where subsumption left off.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Seth</name></author>	</entry>

	</feed>