<?xml version="1.0"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="http://enfascination.com/wiki/skins/common/feed.css?303"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
		<id>http://enfascination.com/wiki/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Reflections_on_the_Commons_Ostrom_1990</id>
		<title>Reflections on the Commons Ostrom 1990 - Revision history</title>
		<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://enfascination.com/wiki/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Reflections_on_the_Commons_Ostrom_1990"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://enfascination.com/wiki/index.php?title=Reflections_on_the_Commons_Ostrom_1990&amp;action=history"/>
		<updated>2026-05-15T13:52:58Z</updated>
		<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.21.0rc5</generator>

	<entry>
		<id>http://enfascination.com/wiki/index.php?title=Reflections_on_the_Commons_Ostrom_1990&amp;diff=2256&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Seth at 17:54, 20 July 2009</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://enfascination.com/wiki/index.php?title=Reflections_on_the_Commons_Ostrom_1990&amp;diff=2256&amp;oldid=prev"/>
				<updated>2009-07-20T17:54:43Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;table class='diff diff-contentalign-left'&gt;
				&lt;col class='diff-marker' /&gt;
				&lt;col class='diff-content' /&gt;
				&lt;col class='diff-marker' /&gt;
				&lt;col class='diff-content' /&gt;
			&lt;tr style='vertical-align: top;'&gt;
			&lt;td colspan='2' style=&quot;background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;&quot;&gt;← Older revision&lt;/td&gt;
			&lt;td colspan='2' style=&quot;background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;&quot;&gt;Revision as of 17:54, 20 July 2009&lt;/td&gt;
			&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; class=&quot;diff-lineno&quot;&gt;Line 1:&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; class=&quot;diff-lineno&quot;&gt;Line 1:&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;This is a critique of most of the perspective in part one, with an eagles eye view of Ostrom's work and goals and main arguments.&amp;#160; &amp;#160; One central one that shines through is emphasizing the ability of people to manage themselves in real-life common pools.&amp;#160; Also brings in game theory&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;This is a critique of most of the perspective in part one, with an eagles eye view of Ostrom's work and goals and main arguments.&amp;#160; &amp;#160; One central one that shines through is emphasizing the ability of people to manage themselves in real-life common pools.&amp;#160; Also brings in game theory&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot;&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;+&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;&lt;/ins&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot;&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;+&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;&amp;quot;...led Robert Smith (1981 p.467) to suggest that &amp;quot;the ''only'' way to avoid the tragedy of the commons in natural resources and wildlife is to end the common-property system by creating a system of private property rights&amp;quot; see also the work of Smith 1984.&amp;#160; ANd Welsh 1983 for the private property fetishists&lt;/ins&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot;&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;+&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;&lt;/ins&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot;&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;+&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;&amp;quot;By &amp;quot;successful&amp;quot; I mean institutions that enable individuals to achieve productive outcomes in situations where tamptations to free-ride and shirk are ever present.&amp;#160; A competitive market-the epitome of private institutions-is itself a public good.&amp;#160; Once a competitve market is provided, individuals can enter and exit freely wheter or not they contribute to the cost of providing and maintaining the market.&amp;#160; No market can exist for long without underlying public instituions to support it.&amp;#160; In field settings, public and private institutions frequently are intermeshed and depend on one another, rather than existing in isolated worlds.&amp;quot;&lt;/ins&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;/table&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Seth</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>http://enfascination.com/wiki/index.php?title=Reflections_on_the_Commons_Ostrom_1990&amp;diff=2244&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Seth at 17:37, 20 July 2009</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://enfascination.com/wiki/index.php?title=Reflections_on_the_Commons_Ostrom_1990&amp;diff=2244&amp;oldid=prev"/>
				<updated>2009-07-20T17:37:03Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;This is a critique of most of the perspective in part one, with an eagles eye view of Ostrom's work and goals and main arguments.    One central one that shines through is emphasizing the ability of people to manage themselves in real-life common pools.  Also brings in game theory&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Seth</name></author>	</entry>

	</feed>