Project Ideas
From enfascination
| (4 intermediate revisions by one user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | ===Now=== | ||
| + | *My possible paths for immediate research (06/09): | ||
| + | **reimplement Kashtan and Alon | ||
| + | ***to look at decay on scaled up systems | ||
| + | ***to scale up systems, and perhaps look at hierarchy | ||
| + | **compare current evo with evo on independent legs, comparing mods | ||
| + | ***simple:calculate mods on arch004 bodies | ||
| + | **evolve topologies on 6-leg agents | ||
| + | ***should I evolve six legs | ||
| + | ***should I change the perturbation? | ||
| + | **Get Paul's agent going | ||
| + | ***Get integration code up | ||
| + | ***get some walkers evolved | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===Distant=== | ||
| + | *For complex pixel images, look at needlepoint patterns, Islamic tiles and time evolution of Wolfram's rules | ||
| + | *The process of development reduces modularity. | ||
| + | *Diaz synch paper and epilepsy | ||
| + | *Mitchell's approach to FARG and modularity in environments | ||
| + | *Look into crowding out | ||
| + | *sports stats | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===Past=== | ||
*Small world is a 'best of both worlds' between diameter of a random graph and clustering coefficient of a lattice. It takes very few random rewirings to give a lattice a random-graph's diameter. Is there a relationship between this and the particularly small value that mutation rate takes in GAs? Mutation rate is often conceptualized as a jump in the solution space, so it may not be hard to establish a connection. | *Small world is a 'best of both worlds' between diameter of a random graph and clustering coefficient of a lattice. It takes very few random rewirings to give a lattice a random-graph's diameter. Is there a relationship between this and the particularly small value that mutation rate takes in GAs? Mutation rate is often conceptualized as a jump in the solution space, so it may not be hard to establish a connection. | ||
Latest revision as of 22:28, 24 June 2009
Now
- My possible paths for immediate research (06/09):
- reimplement Kashtan and Alon
- to look at decay on scaled up systems
- to scale up systems, and perhaps look at hierarchy
- compare current evo with evo on independent legs, comparing mods
- simple:calculate mods on arch004 bodies
- evolve topologies on 6-leg agents
- should I evolve six legs
- should I change the perturbation?
- Get Paul's agent going
- Get integration code up
- get some walkers evolved
- reimplement Kashtan and Alon
Distant
- For complex pixel images, look at needlepoint patterns, Islamic tiles and time evolution of Wolfram's rules
- The process of development reduces modularity.
- Diaz synch paper and epilepsy
- Mitchell's approach to FARG and modularity in environments
- Look into crowding out
- sports stats
Past
- Small world is a 'best of both worlds' between diameter of a random graph and clustering coefficient of a lattice. It takes very few random rewirings to give a lattice a random-graph's diameter. Is there a relationship between this and the particularly small value that mutation rate takes in GAs? Mutation rate is often conceptualized as a jump in the solution space, so it may not be hard to establish a connection.