Coordination paper with Rob

From enfascination

Jump to: navigation, search
 
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
==references for the cognitive angle==
 
==references for the cognitive angle==
 +
===from drew===
 +
*Gigerenzer is a pole in the heuristics community, coming in heavy on the evolution side and walking the line well.  still an inclination in psych that evolutionary psych is not testable/not science.
 +
*peter todd is interested in this stuff, the cognitive angle on macro questions
 +
*prospect theory is offered as the psychologically plausible successor, via Kahneman and Tversky, to expected utility theory. (says [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prospect_theory wikipedia]
 +
*insofar as I am into games over time, I should talk to Busemeyer. 
 +
*in my notes: "no microtheoretic interpretation of organizations"
 
===from Busemeyer, decision-making judgement angle===
 
===from Busemeyer, decision-making judgement angle===
 
*general answer was that this game is too complicated to be of interest to decision making community
 
*general answer was that this game is too complicated to be of interest to decision making community

Latest revision as of 03:05, 13 November 2009

references for the cognitive angle

from drew

  • Gigerenzer is a pole in the heuristics community, coming in heavy on the evolution side and walking the line well. still an inclination in psych that evolutionary psych is not testable/not science.
  • peter todd is interested in this stuff, the cognitive angle on macro questions
  • prospect theory is offered as the psychologically plausible successor, via Kahneman and Tversky, to expected utility theory. (says wikipedia
  • insofar as I am into games over time, I should talk to Busemeyer.
  • in my notes: "no microtheoretic interpretation of organizations"

from Busemeyer, decision-making judgement angle

  • general answer was that this game is too complicated to be of interest to decision making community
  • Busemeyer and Townsend 1993
  • Townsend and Busemeyer 1989
  • Duarte Araujo
  • Rasmussen's game theory
  • Busemeyer 2002 Motivational Underpinnings
  • Emotional Cognition