Matthew on Indiana Jones

From enfascination

Jump to: navigation, search

Indiana Jones

And why the fourth movie was so bad

Indy started in '77 on a beach, SPielburg and Lucas. plyboy alcoholic playboy in manhatten fighting nazis, plot built over a sandcastle. cigarrette habit dropped to

  • 19 years later

Fourth movie

Indiana is a series not a serial

  • ageless, archetypal american hero
  • 1992 Indiana Jones Chronicles to fill in backstroy

These attempts subvery timelessness with details.

Eco distinguishes between Series and Saga. Saga has time over generations. By giving Indy a birth and death, old and youth, he becomes a saga.

As a franchise it shifted from cinematic to products, moving emphasis to images and the idea, the essence is diluted.

Lucas, after 19 years, a generation, is forced to accomodate two audiences in one movie. By this account, he failed.

By 2008, too burdened by backstory. moving to 1950 complicated things too much.

The romance

He was a smart guy. Indy doesn't do anything int he new movie, just wears fedora and leather jacket.