Coordination paper with Rob
From enfascination
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==references for the cognitive angle== | ==references for the cognitive angle== | ||
| + | ===from drew=== | ||
| + | *Gigerenzer is a pole in the heuristics community, coming in heavy on the evolution side and walking the line well. still an inclination in psych that evolutionary psych is not testable/not science. | ||
| + | *peter todd is interested in this stuff, the cognitive angle on macro questions | ||
| + | *prospect theory is offered as the psychologically plausible successor, via Kahneman and Tversky, to expected utility theory. (says [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prospect_theory wikipedia] | ||
| + | *insofar as I am into games over time, I should talk to Busemeyer. | ||
| + | *in my notes: "no microtheoretic interpretation of organizations" | ||
===from Busemeyer, decision-making judgement angle=== | ===from Busemeyer, decision-making judgement angle=== | ||
*general answer was that this game is too complicated to be of interest to decision making community | *general answer was that this game is too complicated to be of interest to decision making community | ||
Latest revision as of 03:05, 13 November 2009
references for the cognitive angle
from drew
- Gigerenzer is a pole in the heuristics community, coming in heavy on the evolution side and walking the line well. still an inclination in psych that evolutionary psych is not testable/not science.
- peter todd is interested in this stuff, the cognitive angle on macro questions
- prospect theory is offered as the psychologically plausible successor, via Kahneman and Tversky, to expected utility theory. (says wikipedia
- insofar as I am into games over time, I should talk to Busemeyer.
- in my notes: "no microtheoretic interpretation of organizations"
from Busemeyer, decision-making judgement angle
- general answer was that this game is too complicated to be of interest to decision making community
- Busemeyer and Townsend 1993
- Townsend and Busemeyer 1989
- Duarte Araujo
- Rasmussen's game theory
- Busemeyer 2002 Motivational Underpinnings
- Emotional Cognition