Philip K. Dick’s vanity was his best protection from his vanity

Learned things about Philip K Dick and his life. Foremost, he named his daughter “Isa Dick”. Talk about a Dick move.

Among his notes about Scanner Darkly were a question and answer “How will the book sell?” Answer: “Such inducements have no appeal to the superior man.” I’m paraphrasing. I like that he both considered the question unselfconsciously and posed himself to deny interest in it. I like how, in the context of an answer to a question about himself, the funny construct of the “superior man” is clearly superior to oneself, not to everyone else (like it would come of in any other context). The phrasing was so peculiar that I Googled it. Expecting to find more by him, I stumbled on the same phrasing in the divination manual The Book of Changes, which he wrote a book about, and got deeper into as he fought less hard against schizophrenia and started to imagine us all in the matrix.

In the image of the notes, under each question and prior to each answer are numbers and dashes and codes that looked meaningless until I returned to the recording after learning about its connection to the I Ching: the questions were real questions he had, and the answers were divined. His roll for the question about how the book will sell was for hexagram 58, where I found the quote about the superior man. That means that he didn’t endogenously pose himself to deny his crass interests, but that his reading emboldened him. In that context, it’s very clear that The Superior Man is best imagined as a version of you that’s notable only for being superior to yourself.

No, I’m wrong. Dick’s question was crass because he was vain. His attraction to the I Ching’s was an attraction to the idea that the Universe is organized around the Superior Man, which is vain. His speechifying about being the One who saw into the computer simulation controlling us was an assertion that he was host to the superior. The only thing that pulled him from the vain thought of his book sales was the vain thought that he was too much better than everyone else to worry about them. Any of my tea leaf reading about this softer interpretation of the superior man says more about my tastes than about either Dick or the Book that inspired him.

I was also interested to learn that, after his divorce, he lived communally but maybe not inappropriately with 1970s street kids, that he was very much from the Bay and Berkeley, and that despite his reputation for a variety of drugs, his devotion was exclusive to prescription amphetamine, on which he wrote most of his books. The mathematician Paul Erdos had the same hangup. They were contemporaries in more ways than one.

I learned all this from the commentary to a Scanner Darkly, which had Linklater, Keanu Reeves, Isa Dick, the flick’s screenwriter, and another person. It’s funny to hear Reeves philosophize without the benefit of a script. Nearly every time he spoke up, it was like hearing a philosophical conversation between a bunch of sage elders as convened and presided over by a stoned 14 year-old.